History论文模板 – WHY HAVE HISTORIANS INCREASINGLY TURNED AWAY FROM STUDYING (TEXT’S) AUTHORS TO FOCUS INSTEAD ON STUDYING (TEXT’S) READERS?

Introduction

       This paper will explain why historians have hugely preferred studying texts or writings for reading and avoided using study text for authors. Over the recent decades, arguments amongst the postmodernist and supporters of a realistic idea of historical studies are mainly interested in how the historical texts or primary sources are interpreted, handled, and read to make valid claims about the past.[1] In addition, the growing number of monographs has tried to sketch the epistemological foundations for the study of histories and the availability of knowledge about the past. Through this, they engage in what is known as postmodernism.[2] Therefore, historians have increasingly focused on the readers because they realized that their limitations are the advantages of researching the readers. This change refers to the texts’ authenticity, motive, and identification.

      Over the past years, the narrative has become the most argued topic among various historians. Hayden White warned readers that historical texts are stories, and more so, they do not have a list of materials for some data. But as a fact they present them as a sequence with a specific order, which clearly shows the start and the end, and a structured method for the bulk of content items in between.[3] Readers read the text through wringing and speaking. After the linguistic turn, reading texts in the education environment should scrutinize the text and the act of reading. The historical mandate of reading text from the current history is first solved through the linguistic turn and put into general through postmodernism, which focuses on the varieties of media and the historical situations.

       The relationship between the primary source and the text is that the primary source describes the traditions in the source. And through the illustration of examples on how one can read and use in the historical study. Primary sources rely on letters, novels, and memoranda to make references.

Historiography

       Early historians were not so much concerned with themselves, but they were interested in the semantics and the philosophical issues. Many of them understood history as history until recently. Historiography is defined as the writing of the past and mainly centered on the critical evaluation of materials and entails the collection of materials from authentic sources with the details necessary to complete a crucial analysis.[4] Current historians focus on restructuring the history of human beings and comprehending more about them. Many of these historians use the reader’s text, unlike the author’s text.

Why do Historians use texts?

       Historians used past events to research and restructure the one-time occurrence. This is because the written text provides room for restructuring past events. There is a vast significance for the historians’ use of literature that illustrates the importance of diverse information and communication technology devices for humanists than for others. For instance, historians use Newspapers because they are rich in relevant materials.[5] Over the past several historical newspapers have been digitalized, thus fulfilling advanced accessibility and an influential examination.

       Moreover, historians also have preferred technology or digitized materials to collect information for their research projects. Though historians chose the use of original documents, their preferences began to change and adopted the usage of digital devices for their research.[6] Digital historical records are an essential source of information. Each potential study or research provided the historians with the required knowledge.

       The medieval and the modern historians from Europe championed the new approach of historiography. They performed by involving the women, workers, and witches. All this began in the year 1960s. They brought in some critical assumptions and evaluations of information they were interested in.[7] They studied personal subjects and historical past events. For instance, the night battle, one of the traditional forms of micro-history which used the court files. Letters of remissions are essential because they are vital sources that are a reasonably uninterrupted idea from the lower commands.[8] The regulations for historians are the biggest of any archives avoided during recording.

Why the Historians used to research the author?

Historians in the past used to research the authors to interpret past events.[9] As they read the past events, they could understand their particular environment.[10] In addition, they were investigating the author directly influenced people’s lives in the past. Many people view history as a series of facts with dates and events that represent the past and are recorded in textbooks by authors.[11] Therefore, historians studied the historical interpretation and the authors as interpreters of evidence from the past. For example, they were reading letters and diaries.

Historians developed a critical reading strategy to entirely comprehend what was happening in the past. However, the methods of historical criticism were from other disciplines, which created the desire to confirm and secure records earlier before historiography.[12] Historians currently focus on rhetorical and moral questions rather than on understanding or awareness of the past. For instance, biblical criticism, classical philology, and the current jurisprudence formed the main information.

The humanist of the sixteenth and fifteenth centuries started considering developing a picture of the classical authors of antiquity as inaccurate. The old generation of classics was based on handwritten documents which had changed the original text, which did not relate with any religious text. The humanist, for example, began collecting the old handwritten copies across the world.

Another example is that the seventeenth-century clerics published documents and records relating to the church’s history and began a historical interest in the Christian traditions. The clerical reading of the text led to the summary and conclusions and translation of text from the Bible. Richard Simon, in 1678, identified the key lessons of structures of language in the Old Testament.

What are the significance of research the authors?

       Researching the authors is significant to historians as they can acquire reading skills. Author studies require a lot of concentration in reading and giving the historian a chance to shape their reading fluency. In addition, with the author’s reflections, historians can compare and contrast topics, examine text and examples, and create a linkage between the author’s work and the reader’s individual life.[13] Researching the author’s text also makes reading a more unique and fulfilling experience.

       Droysen believed that historiography aims at the social task capable of solving human problems. He trusts that the study of history could change the habits of his generations’ practices, which is why he was charged with collecting information from the past.[14] Droysen considered the sources as applicable in the future as interpreted by the historians.

What is the significance of researching the readers?

       Reading is a process of understanding the meaning, hence bringing their early thinking to the other part of the reading method to study the readers’ understanding of the definition of the text they read. It shows that readers’ thoughtfulness and the definition of text they read.[15] The objective of studying reading text is to understand the ability to create meaning of the text is.[16] Studies found that reading is not a passive skill but an active skill.

       Furthermore, there are differences in researching authors and researching texts. For instance, the primary sources are the firsthand, contemporary accounts of individual activities developed several decades later like diaries, correspondence, unique histories, and memoirs.[17] This historical information can be found in numerous media like artwork, prints, visual recording, and audio. Examples of primary sources include newspapers, manuscripts, speeches, artifacts, and photographs.[18]

What are the differences between researching the authors and Researching the Reader?

Primary sources are defined as sources close to the origin of the information. They contain raw data and hence should be interpreted by the researchers.[19] At the same time, the secondary sources, on the other hand, relate to the information that emanated from somewhere else.[20] It mainly uses analysis, generalization, synthesis, and interpretation of primary sources. An example of secondary sources involves articles, reference books, and textbooks.

For example, in the advertising industry, the readers try to show how the text works with the probable reading of the text. But sometimes, the expectations or the needs differ. What brings together the projected benefit is understanding cultural requirements and sometimes results in resistance to reading text if the text does not meet the reader’s condition. [21]

Reading and Authenticity

       Judging the text’s authenticity is the first benefit of researching the readers.

       In order to judge the authenticity of the text within this paper and why the historians do not study the authors but the readers, the article will focus on two dimensions the nature of the text being read and the purpose of reading. The most authentic goal is if the literacy function serves the social communication objective like reading to obtain information that one desires to understand or write to offer information to someone who wants. The authentic text elements should be used by readers and writers outside the study area.

       This paper defines reading as a connection between the reader and text. Reading is a subjective experience; however, the text remains fixed. Readers unavoidably differ in the resources they incorporate into the reading experience in their original understanding and the reading experience. The relations can be observed in two levels of the process where the actual competence and outlook then manifest into something more coherent and critical.[22] Synthetic readings are knowledgeable and not created. They happen when the readers are deprived of the environment to engage in their analysis process.[23] Studies indicate that teachers and students understand the effect studying can possess when reading for pleasure. Therefore, authentic reading is referred to as a chance to avoid loss.

       For instance, reading storybooks to children is acknowledged as a significant function that promotes literacy growth. Study shows that children do not focus on printed books. Young people in this century are highly exposed to technology. As a result, they get exposed to readers through the adult reading through the technological books available in the internet.[24] The electronic books include the media effects like written text, oral reading, music, duplicate sound, and animations. Electronic textbooks for children are motivating and bring a productive activity for children.[25] The experience of learners using the electronic sources for reading is more important and shows the reading authenticity in contrast to the more traditional complex approach.

       Moreover, there are some significant questions that historians and policymakers should deliberate on the ways and the practices of reading. For example, why do learners read literature? In what condition do they read literature? What strategies do they apply when facing and reacting to literary texts? Young readers observe reading as an imaginative leap. This emotional and individual brings the reader and interpretations together at an individual, and broad social group fears the kind of representation of knowledge that young readers have and apply when reading.[26] A more recent and modified turn in literary studies has been used from linguistics and cognitive science to inform the study of reading practices and texts, usually in cognitive poetics. Informed cognitive styles to reading have changed from the theoretical perspectives of thoughtful readers to the experimental studies.[27] They describe the psychological, emotional reactions that the readers face and highlight the individual and the social scopes of reading and the interpretive responses through the study of book clubs and reading groups.[28] Therefore, researchers in this field can expound in more elaborate and less attractive terms that the reader’s fantasy world is discussed, agreed upon, and maintained.[29] Readers identify the characters and activities through the method of simulation. These methods provide the chance to transform through the cognitive scope the young people provided as the reasons for wanting to read.

       There are two basic concepts in this first case: the figure-ground interactions and the concept of attention focus. The second is the Schema theory, precisely the idea of narrative schemas. First, figure-ground as a complex developed trope in optical mindset. It simply means that humans cannot focus on one thing at a go.[30] Therefore, at any given time, the object may fall in the primary visual to create the figure of our focus, and every other activity falls into the ground. Some traits and factors can create focus, thus making the object to be more likely figured, like newness, brightness, and movement.[31] However, the attention changes from a figure to something in the ground, the new objects of the attention changes to a new figure of attraction.

       Moreover, in the course of studies, the teacher sets a task to gauge the authenticity of the learner’s ability to read text. It usually happens when teachers decide the themes that the learners will read and observe the main task.[32] In this situation, the teacher is factoring the student’s attention; therefore, in this case, chances on maximizing on and interrelating the learner reading with the knowledge and understanding they bring to the class environment.[33] It is authentic and significantly effective to student arrangement with the text.

       Another example is the piece’s villain, where the aspects are prefigured before entering the classroom. Some characters in the novel apply schemas necessary for helping the students to create schemas from reading from the lesson. Therefore unlike their peers, they could fully understand the text.[34] For instance, the novel prefigured the warden as a villain. Meaning that using the Carl reading, the students were contradicted.

Researching readers is a good way to extrapolate the motives of the text’s authors

       Though the reader’s connection to the authors has been described over the past centuries, and from the start of classical rhetoric to the twenty-first century comprising of theories, there is a lot to learn about the connection as shown by the existing objects in diverse opinions concerning the subject.[35] There is no perfect way to define the relationship between the audience and the author. The relationship between the audiences is defined as a group of fictional and real invented readers. The author and audience connection are often referred to as the communication and the heart of rhetoric concerns. The perception of the relationship between the author and audience is vital in the touch of rhetoric tradition highlighted by Aristotle, Quintilian, and Cicero.[36] For instance, in Aristotle’s rhetoric, the speaker or the author appeals to logos’ practical inherent matter. The audience’s emotions, called pathos, are known as ethos.

       Furthermore, researchers typically trace the audience’s understanding within the author’s rhetorical problem. Studies have found that the author may observe his audience as an individual, actual or imagined, multiple, and evolving.[37] Further, many studies show that the audience’s thought is recursive, happening through the processes; therefore, the audience has an existing consciousness on the writer’s side. Investigations also show that the author’s attraction to and the thoughts of connection with their reads directly impact task representations, goals, idea generation, and the word of choice.[38]

       Research of student writers has found that identifying with and writing for other audiences increases with experience and age. Students without the experience often require help with research and audience awareness.[39] Also, research indicates strategies such as the audience response and task of a real audience, and other beneficial techniques.[40] In addition, some of the research has found having the ability to attribute to the author’s motives is a facet to the experts reading. The expert readings often sometimes take a conversation between the author and the reader. The response given by the author argues about the author’s phrasing, wordings, punctuations, the position of the material, and the impact of the intended audience. Other readers may sometimes choose what they want to read based on their experience with different authors.

       Moreover, specific writing characteristics make an author more visual to their audience. Some literary devices like sarcasm, figures of speech, irony, hyperbole, and understanding rely on the reader’s ability to understand the author’s meaning, voice, stance, and tone. These devices include imagery, theme, motifs, reality devices, and foreshadowing.[41] Research of learners’ reactions to visual authors in academic textbooks, like the Crismore and the Nolen, indicates the learners’ negative and positive responses. Therefore, if the learners perceive the authors as helpful, then the reaction to the authors is positive; However, the visual author may be a problem

in chapter one; she explains that the book’s first three chapters should attract the reader to the story. She also advises them to work extra hard by writing them as well as possible.[42] Young writers should find enough suspense in the audience to illustrate the end of the chapter. She clarifies that a good story does not rush but moves gradually with the reader’s pace.

       Authors and readers relate in terms of what they assume concerning the other. The assumptions are generally based on the author’s primary characteristics for the audience. The author cannot fully understand the readers, and the reader cannot understand the author.[43] Teachers will always break the narrative by encouraging their learners to understand what the writer is talking about. Vagueness in the reader’s attitude frustrates both the student and the teacher. However, the general question of how the authors view the audience in writing is not susceptible to the main description; it should be promising through interviews, case studies, and introspection to elaborate the type of issues authors deal with knowingly.[44] Contrary to the kind of solutions they propose in their rhetoric problems.

Researching the Readers is also helpful to determine the identities of authors

       Identity is becoming the most critical part of the study of the text. Over the years, written discourse evaluation and language learning did not have much to consider. Mainly because the use of written discourse evaluation aimed primarily at academic writing order in a restricted array of classroom genres, and the reasonable objective of assisting authors adapt to the local speaker norm was broadly accepted.[45] Various assumptions that encourage the study and learning of the written discourse have transformed over the past years. The use of the local speaker as the point of reference has been identified. Many researchers have started integrating the experienced users of the field, notwithstanding the background of the language.[46] The internationalization and diversification of languages have also become widely accepted. Thus, the desire to resolve personal and social differences in writing has brought a significant deliberation, though the impact of the same changes on paper is not always physical.[47] Therefore the modernist illustrations of language and identity have openly received a lot of criticisms, thus creating a new environment for considering the changing aspects and the various identity constructions and their impacts on academic and professional life.

       Moreover, identity in a written discourse is a compound sensation that integrates the empirical reality that is measurable and easy to describe and the phenomenon that exists in an individual’s opinion. Understanding identity in a written course is significant to differentiate between the author’s identity placements o the author that is external to the discourse, like the information on demography.[48] Therefore, identity is developed and discussed through the discourse, not necessarily material reality, and impressions are taken. For instance, the voice and characteristics of ethos.[49] These two aspects of identity are mainly tied to one another. However, it cannot sum parts of textual features. Still, it is a social concept developed in interactions between the different basics of writing, such as the interactions among the reader and writer. They relate through the text in a specific condition of the text.

       Identification recognizes the voice of the readers and the author’s text. The writer’s choices create the writer’s identity, and the reader ultimately perceives the expressions of options. The definition of the author’s identity accounts for the indexicality of different traits of the text in developing the social meaning, therefore, placing in the perception of feature-based definitions of the author’s identity.[50] Discourse characteristics consider the non-discursive features like visible document elements and design like videos, images, and the sound impacts incorporated into the multimedia text. The perception of voice as an effect shows that a full appreciation of identity requires the text’s concerns, writer, reader, and relationship.[51] All these elements must be examined in a single study. Therefore, it is critical to analyze each aspect separated from knowing how they support the discussion and voice construction. However, the features are the supporting factors and not the voice.[52] In addition, applied linguistics has a strong tradition of exploring textual elements and practices. Various researchers have aimed at one of the features of a writer’s identity, like elements and textual convention that support the creation of the writer’s identity.

       Furthermore, the textual practices linked to expressing the writer’s identity include the evaluation, appraisal, stance, judgment, posture, and intensity. The model of interaction can be divided into two key constructs; engagement and stance. Stance is the people recognized personality, author oriented practice, and attitudinal which alarms the process authors presents them and show their opinions, judgments, and comments.[53] There are three types of stand like effect, presence, and evidentially which is arrived such as boosters, hedges, attitude markers, and self-mention.[54] An engagement which is an element of audience consciousness, is more in aligning the practice concerning the process that authors rhetorically understand the presence of their audience to involve them when arguing effectively and include them as the supporters and direct them through the interpretations.

       Creating the writer’s identity means being more considerate in presenting an individual by creating a vast repertoire and being more conscious of the implications of their own choices. Learners who are writers and writing instructors should always deliberate elements of voice not as fixed rules to adhere to. Instead, they set tools that, when appropriately implemented, can assist in developing an authorial voice, which could improve the general quality of a part of writing.[55] That is, a fruitful social-constructivist in achieving the particular rhetoric objective, which can be described as the agentive voice.

What are the Limitations of Researching Text Readers?

`      In the education environment, reading is anticipated as the key process of learning new information and achieving access to the interpretations and explanations. Reading is a way through which the writer communicates with the reader. On the contrary, reading is not easy as it needs a series of sentences for an individual to comprehend what the writer is talking about. When the readers read the texts, it is upon them to deliberate if the author’s text can transform their opinions or perception regarding the text. Therefore, it is arguable that the text implies that the readers have changed their perception and trust in their lives.[56] Readers can evaluate the reader’s text and say if they are altered by the chosen topic or criticize it.[57] If the information intended by the author to reach the reader impresses the reader, the text may change the life of the reader.[58] Learners study because it is a skill of energy required to transform them.

       For example, most students may fail to read English, meaning that they do not understand the context. This challenge may appear because they are poor in vocabulary and reading, resulting in slow reading. Before the author begins to write, they should first decide if the content will change the reader’s life or bring good results. Authors should have a plan before writing or displaying their thoughts and ideas. They will gather and show the accuracy, align to the topic, and organize in chronological order.[59] Authors are required to begin with the specific overall views so that the message in the text will assist the readers in studying at a gradual pace.

       Though most historians currently prefer reading text other than the author’s work, studies show that they are deemed to face challenges of comprehension of the topic or theme. Complexity of the topic reduces the ability of the reader to understand the text and leading to the dissatisfaction and frustration. The text should engage the reader and be understandable to the reader.

       Reading may sometimes be a challenge for people when they struggle to break the accuracy in pronouncing a word. Some of them may struggle to match the text to the written illustrations. For example, mentally sick or challenged people may find it hard to pronounce some of the phonological sounds of a spoken word.[60]Challenges of decoding the sound result from challenges in reading accuracy. 

       Individuals having the problem of reading effectively are mainly understood as having a slow reading rate. Meaning the reading rate per minute is slow. Individuals with a good sense of mind may read fluently at a good pace.[61] In addition, comprehension skills may prove to be a challenge to the learners as they require them to have the necessary skills that are not crucial to the comprehension of the narrative passages.

       Most of the learning comprehension contains both the inferential and literal questions in their evaluation measures, but they do not evaluate the performance of every question kind individually.[62] Comprehension poses a threat to children’s ability to differentiate its both types. The main parts of vulnerability may be overlooked as it is hard to prove whether the learners fail to read and understand the features of the text.[63] Various tests and questions are mainly centered on different skills; therefore, some readers may be more complex than others. The challenge question and text complexity are essential in recognizing the reading ability in learners. Current studies try to solve challenges by evaluating text questions, relationship features, and intellectual skills.

Conclusion

       Historians study historical text to evaluate and interpret human identities and changes of communities and progress over time. Historians apply the various approaches and materials to respond to questions concerning the past and restructure the differences in historical human proficiencies. They explain how past human experiences have brought different organizations and cultural backgrounds. Historians also explain how their views have changed over time in other places and how they have fought while living in a shared world. Historians apply different materials to explain the personal lives and shared performances into accounts that brought severe outlooks on both the present and the past. Learning history assists in comprehending and dealing with challenging questions and problems by evaluating how the experience has changed and continues to shape the national, global, and local interactions among the people and societies.

       Studying about the past helps historians understand and acknowledge ideas, cultures, and the traditions of other people and respect them. History also helps people understand how the experience of living in the past is different from the current life. Through past studies, historians learn how people’s activities fit into the human experience.

Bibliography

Albiladi, W. S. (2019). Exploring the Use of Written Authentic Materials in ESL Reading Classes: Benefits and Challenges. English Language Teaching12(1), 67-77.

Allen, Robert B., and Robert Sieczkiewicz. “How historians use historical newspapers.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, no. 1 (2010): 1-4.

Anderson, Richard Chase. “Interestingness of children’s reading material.” Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 323 (1984).

Bentley, Michael (ed.), Companion to Historiography (1997)

Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. “Finding identity: Theory and data.” (2008): 151-163.

Cliff Hodges, Gabrielle. “Reasons for reading: why literature matters.” Literacy 44, no. 2 (2010): 60-68.

Cremin, Teresa, Kathy Goouch, and Andrew Lambirth. “Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: Critical Perspectives.” (2007): 166.

Daw, Peter. “Achieving High Grades at ‘A’Level English Literature: An Investigation into Factors that Contribute to Schools’ Successes.” English in Education 30, no. 3 (1996): 15-26.

Dymoke, Sue. “Taking poetry off its pedestal: The place of poetry writing in an assessment-driven curriculum.” English in Education 35, no. 3 (2001): 32-41.

Eaglestone, R., ‘”Not read and consumed in the same way as other books”: The

experience of reading Holocaust testimony’, Critical Quarterly, 45, 3 (2003), 32-41

Faire, L and Gunn, S., Research Methods for History (2nd edition, 2016)

Fearon, James D. “What is identity (as we now use the word).” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (1999). 1-3

Freire, Paulo. “The importance of the act of reading.” Journal of education 165, no. 1 (1983): 5-11.

Giovanelli, Marcello, and Jessica Mason. “‘Well I don’t feel that’: Schemas, worlds and authentic reading in the classroom.” English in Education 49, no. 1 (2015): 41-55.

Guo, Siao-cing. “Using Authentic Materials for Extensive Reading to Promote English Proficiency.” English Language Teaching 5, no. 8 (2012): 196-206.

Hall, Sophie Susannah, John Maltby, Ruth Filik, and Kevin B. Paterson. “Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability.” Educational Psychology 36, no. 2 (2016): 191-215.

Hartman, Douglas K., and Jeanette A. Hartman. “Reading across texts: Expanding the role of the reader.” The reading teacher 47, no. 3 (1993): 202-211.

Islam, Syaiful, and Edi Santoso. “The effectiveness of using authentic texts in the teaching reading comprehension.” ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal) 4, no. 2 (2018): 166-180.

Jamrus, Mohd Hafizuddin Mohamed, and Abu Bakar Razali. “Augmented reality in teaching and learning English reading: Realities, possibilities, and limitations.” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 8, no. 4 (2019): 724-737.

Janan, Dahlia, and David Wray. “Readability: The limitations of an approach through formulae.” In Br. Educ. Res. Assoc. Annu. Conf. Univ. Manchester, pp. 1-16. 2012.

Jones, Jill S., Kristin Conradi, and Steven J. Amendum. “Matching interventions to reading needs: A case for differentiation.” The Reading Teacher 70, no. 3 (2016): 307-316.

Kernot, David, Terry Bossomaier, and Roger Bradbury. “Using Shakespeare’s Sotto Voce to determine true identity from text.” Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018): 289.

Laing, Audrey. “Authors using social media: Layers of identity and the online author community.” Publishing Research Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2017): 254-267.

Laura Sangha, ‘Personal Documents’, in L. Sangha and J. Willis (eds.), Understanding Early Modern Primary Sources (2016), 107-28

Leary, Mark R., and June Price Tangney, eds. Handbook of self and identity. Guilford Press, 2011.

Marwick, Arthur, The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language (2001)

Marzban, Amir, and Solmaz Davaji. “The effect of authentic texts on motivation and reading comprehension of EFL students at intermediate level of proficiency.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5, no. 1 (2015): 85.

Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources (2009), 209-25

Rahimivand, Masumeh, and Davud Kuhi. “An exploration of discoursal construction of identity in academic writing.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014): 1492-1501.

Robert Darnton, ‘History of Reading’, in P. Burke, ed., New Perspectives on Historical

Scott, Joan, Gender and the Politics of History (Second edition, 2000)

Short, Kathy G. “Making connections across literature and life.” Journeying: Children responding to literature (1993): 284-301.

Simon, Sunka. “Marlene Kadar, Linda Warley, Jeanne Perreault, Susanna Egan, eds. Tracing the Autobiographical.” (2007).

Sinn, Donghee, and Nicholas Soares. “Historians’ use of digital archival collections: The web, historical scholarship, and archival research.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, no. 9 (2014): 1794-1809.

Smith, M. Cecil. “The Benefits of Writing.” Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language and Literacy (2013): 1-2.

Spring, Albert. ME Kerr. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc, 2005.

Stephen Vella, ‘Newspapers’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources (2009), 192-208

Tamboli, Mubin Shaukat, and Rajesh S. Prasad. “Authorship analysis and identification techniques: a review.” International Journal of Computer Applications 77, no. 16 (2013).

Uppstad, Per Henning, and Oddny Judith Solheim. “Code and comprehension in written language: Considering limitations to the simple view of reading.” (2011).

Usó, Esther, and Mª Noelia Ruiz-Madrid. “Reading printed versus online texts. A study of EFL learners strategic reading behavior.” International Journal of English Studies 9, no. 2 (2009).

Vacca, Richard T., Jo Anne L. Vacca, and Maryann E. Mraz. “Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.” (2005). 284

Vajjala, Sowmya. “Trends, limitations and open challenges in automatic readability assessment research.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00973 (2021). 2

Writing (2nd edition, 2001), 157-86

Zarrati, Zahra, Radha MK Nambiar, and Tengku Nor Rizan Tg Mohd Maasum. “The importance of text structure awareness in promoting strategic reading among EFL readers.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 118 (2014): 537-544.


[1] Stephen Vella, ‘Newspapers’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary

Sources (2009), 192-208

[2] Stephen Vella, ‘Newspapers’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.) 1

[3] Laura Sangha, ‘Personal Documents’, in L. Sangha and J. Willis (eds.), Understanding Early

Modern Primary Sources (2016), 107-28

[4] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources

(2009), 209-25

[5] Allen, Robert B., and Robert Sieczkiewicz. “How historians use historical newspapers.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, no. 1 (2010): 1-4.

[6] Sinn, Donghee, and Nicholas Soares. “Historians’ use of digital archival collections: The web, historical scholarship, and archival research.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, no. 9 (2014): 1794-1809.

[7] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources

(2009), 209-25

[8] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources

(2009), 209-25

[9] Laura Sangha, ‘Personal Documents’, in L. Sangha and J. Willis (eds.), Understanding Early 107

[10] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), Reading Primary Sources

(2009), 209-25

[11] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), 37

[12] Laura Sangha, ‘Personal Documents’, in L. Sangha and J. Willis (eds.), Understanding Early 108

[13] Laura Sangha, ‘Personal Documents’, in L. Sangha and J. Willis (eds.), Understanding Early 107

[14] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), 25

[15] Robert Darnton, ‘History of Reading’, in P. Burke, ed., New Perspectives on Historical

Writing (2nd edition, 2001), 157-86

[16] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), 25

[17] Robert Darnton, ‘History of Reading’, in P. Burke, ed., New Perspectives on Historical

Writing (2nd edition, 2001), 86

[18] Briggs, A. and Burke, P., Social History of the Media (2009)

[19] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), 25

[20] Paul Readman, ‘Speeches’, in M. Dobson and B. Ziemann (eds.), 25

[21] Briggs, A. and Burke, P., Social History of the Media (2009)

[22] Southgate, Beverley, Why Bother with History: Ancient, Modern and Postmodern

Motivations (2000)

[23] Islam, Syaiful, and Edi Santoso. “The effectiveness of using authentic texts in the teaching reading comprehension.” ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal) 4, no. 2 (2018): 166-180.

[24] Korat, Ofra. “Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade.” Computers & Education 55, no. 1 (2010): 24-31.

[25] Korat, Ofra. “Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade.” 25

[26] Albiladi, W. S. (2019). Exploring the Use of Written Authentic Materials in ESL Reading Classes: Benefits and Challenges. English Language Teaching12(1), 67-77.

[27] Guo, Siao-cing. “Using Authentic Materials for Extensive Reading to Promote English Proficiency.” English Language Teaching 5, no. 8 (2012): 196-206.

[28] Marwick, Arthur, The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language (2001)

[29] Faire, L and Gunn, S., Research Methods for History (2nd edition, 2016)

[30] Olney, James. Memory and narrative: The weave of life-writing. University of Chicago Press, 1998.

[31] Cremin, Teresa, Kathy Goouch, and Andrew Lambirth. “Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: Critical Perspectives.” (2007): 166.

[32] Cliff Hodges, Gabrielle. “Reasons for reading: why literature matters.” Literacy 44, no. 2 (2010): 60-68.

[33] Dymoke, Sue. “Taking poetry off its pedestal: The place of poetry writing in an assessment-driven curriculum.” English in Education 35, no. 3 (2001): 32-41.

[34] Cliff Hodges, Gabrielle. “Reasons for reading: why literature matters.” Literacy 44, no. 2 (2010): 60-68.

[35] Anderson, Richard Chase. “Interestingness of children’s reading material.” Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 323 (1984).

[36] Usó, Esther, and Mª Noelia Ruiz-Madrid. “Reading printed versus online texts. A study of EFL learners strategic reading behavior.” International Journal of English Studies 9, no. 2 (2009).

[37] Vacca, Richard T., Jo Anne L. Vacca, and Maryann E. Mraz. “Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.” (2005). 284

[38] Vacca, Richard T., Jo Anne L. Vacca, and Maryann E. Mraz. “Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.” (2005). 284

[39] Zarrati, Zahra, Radha MK Nambiar, and Tengku Nor Rizan Tg Mohd Maasum. “The importance of text structure awareness in promoting strategic reading among EFL readers.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 118 (2014): 537-544.

[40] Hall, Sophie Susannah, John Maltby, Ruth Filik, and Kevin B. Paterson. “Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability.” Educational Psychology 36, no. 2 (2016): 191-215.

[41] Jones, Jill S., Kristin Conradi, and Steven J. Amendum. “Matching interventions to reading needs: A case for differentiation.” The Reading Teacher 70, no. 3 (2016): 307-316.

[42] Smith, M. Cecil. “The Benefits of Writing.” Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language and Literacy (2013): 1-2.

[43] Hartman, Douglas K., and Jeanette A. Hartman. “Reading across texts: Expanding the role of the reader.” The reading teacher 47, no. 3 (1993): 202-211.

[44] Short, Kathy G. “Making connections across literature and life.” Journeying: Children responding to literature (1993): 284-301.

[45] Fearon, James D. “What is identity (as we now use the word).” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (1999). 1-3

[46] Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. “Finding identity: Theory and data.” (2008): 151-163.

[47] Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. “Finding identity: Theory and data 156

[48] Tamboli, Mubin Shaukat, and Rajesh S. Prasad. “Authorship analysis and identification techniques: a review.” International Journal of Computer Applications 77, no. 16 (2013).

[49] Rahimivand, Masumeh, and Davud Kuhi. “An exploration of discoursal construction of identity in academic writing.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014): 1492-1501.

[50] Kernot, David, Terry Bossomaier, and Roger Bradbury. “Using Shakespeare’s Sotto Voce to determine true identity from text.” Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018): 289.

[51] Laing, Audrey. “Authors using social media: Layers of identity and the online author community.” Publishing Research Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2017): 254-267.

[52] Simon, Sunka. “Marlene Kadar, Linda Warley, Jeanne Perreault, Susanna Egan, eds. Tracing the Autobiographical.” (2007).

[53] Eaglestone, R., ‘“Not read and consumed in the same way as other books”: The experience of reading Holocaust testimony’, Critical Quarterly, 45, 3 (2003), 32-41

[54] Leary, Mark R., and June Price Tangney, eds. Handbook of self and identity. Guilford Press, 2011.

[55] Scott, Joan, Gender and the Politics of History (Second edition, 2000)  80

[56] Vajjala, Sowmya. “Trends, limitations and open challenges in automatic readability assessment research.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00973 (2021).

[57] Korinth, Sebastian P., and Telse Nagler. “Improving reading rates and comprehension? Benefits and limitations of the reading acceleration approach.” Language and Linguistics Compass 15, no. 3 (2021): e12408.

[58] Korinth, Sebastian P., and Telse Nagler. “Improving reading rates and comprehension? Benefits and limitations of the reading acceleration approach, 2

[59] Korinth, Sebastian P., and Telse Nagler, 2

[60] Uppstad, Per Henning, and Oddny Judith Solheim. “Code and comprehension in written language: Considering limitations to the simple view of reading.” (2011). 164

[61] Marzban, Amir, and Solmaz Davaji. “The effect of authentic texts on motivation and reading comprehension of EFL students at intermediate level of proficiency.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5, no. 1 (2015): 85.

[62] Marzban, Amir, and Solmaz Davaji. “The effect of authentic texts on motivation and reading comprehension of EFL students at intermediate level of proficiency, 86

[63] Jamrus, Mohd Hafizuddin Mohamed, and Abu Bakar Razali. “Augmented reality in teaching and learning English reading: Realities, possibilities, and limitations.” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 8, no. 4 (2019): 724-737.

Scroll to Top